Learning Center

We keep you up-to-date on the latest tax changes and news in the industry.

Understanding Michigan's Cannabis Tax Battle

Michigan stands at the forefront of another significant cannabis regulatory conflict — this time regarding a proposed 24% wholesale tax on marijuana that is already encountering constitutional scrutiny. This legal battle involving the new tax has captured national interest due to its potential to alter cannabis pricing structures and its implications for voter-backed legislation and tax policies across the U.S.

Regardless of whether you are a cannabis consumer or live far from Michigan, the legal proceedings here could influence how other states formulate, adjust, and uphold cannabis-related taxes. It could also serve as a precursor to future legal challenges amid the expanding cannabis sector.

This is what Americans should know.

Michigan’s Tax Proposal Unveiled

The Michigan state budget for 2025–2026 includes the introduction of a 24% wholesale tax on cannabis, aimed at funding road infrastructure upgrades. This taxation approach applies earlier in the supply chain, preceding retail sale displays.

Currently, Michigan levies two additional taxes:

  • A 10% excise tax on cannabis at the retail level, ratified by the electorate in 2018

  • A 6% state sales tax

Should the wholesale tax proceed, Michigan might adopt one of the most elevated cannabis tax structures nationally, something that has prompted debate.

Image 1

Reasons Behind the Industry Lawsuit

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) has filed a lawsuit questioning the constitutional legality of the tax. Their primary claim is:

The marijuana legalization legislation, passed via the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA) in 2018, is safeguarded against alterations without a supermajority consensus.

Despite this, the lawmakers advanced the wholesale tax with a simple majority, prompting MCIA spokesperson Rose Tantraphol to stress the importance of upholding voter intentions:

“As the leading cannabis trade association, we’re here in court fighting to protect the will of Michigan voters.” (Source: Michigan Advance)

Industry representatives caution that the elevated tax could increase consumer costs, challenge small business viability, and potentially steer buyers to unregulated cannabis markets, an issue that has plagued high-tax jurisdictions like California.

Image 2

The State's Defense

Michigan’s governmental stance supports the tax's legality based on:

  • Its establishment as a new levy, distinct from the 2018 cannabis legislation

  • The legislative authority to impose taxes addressing fiscal requirements

  • Its focus on financing transportation infrastructure without meddling in cannabis regulation

If judicial entities rule in favor of the tax, it may be enforced by January 1, 2026.

Consumer Impact Analysis

Americans beyond Michigan’s borders should monitor developments as cannabis taxation frameworks often extend their influence across state lines. If the taxation withstands judicial scrutiny:

  • Wholesale cannabis pricing could surge

  • Dispensaries might raise retail prices in response

  • An uptick in untaxed cannabis market activity could occur

  • Economic strain might consolidate smaller industry players

On the contrary, striking down the tax measure would maintain Michigan’s cannabis tax model as relatively inexpensive when compared nationwide.

Image 3

National Repercussions from Michigan’s Case

While the lawsuit is Michigan-centric, its ramifications could transcend state lines:

1. Testing the Boundaries of Voter-Endorsed Legislation

A ruling favoring legislative alteration of ballot initiatives sans supermajorities could redefine processes across initiatives-reliant states.

2. Potential to Influence Other State Cannabis Tax Strategies

States battling budget shortfalls may observe Michigan's outcomes when considering comparable taxing solutions.

3. Ongoing Debate: Variances in Cannabis Taxation

Disparate tax levels between states (like Oregon and Michigan's modest vs. California's high) drive compliance challenges. Michigan's legal strategy could serve as a template for legalization challenges elsewhere.

Anticipating Legal Developments

A Michigan Court of Claims judge recently evaluated arguments and is expected to deliver a ruling shortly, possibly escalating the matter to the Michigan Supreme Court.

Regardless of the outcome, the decision will fundamentally shape Michigan’s cannabis economic landscape and influence nationwide regulatory approaches to voter-initiated laws, burgeoning industry sectors, and fiscal governance strategies.

Share this article...

Want our best tax and accounting tips and insights delivered to your inbox?

Sign up for our newsletter.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .
Questions? We have answers.
FAQ
Please fill out the form and our team will get back to you shortly The form was sent successfully